Some Windows Vista answers

A few weeks ago I invited readers to throw some Windows Vista questions and comnments my way. Here are a few answers.

David writes:

I really dislike the UAC prompt seems to appear in diffrent places of the screen depending on where the action occured that created it. For example, move to a program files folder and select “organize>new folder.” Why am I prompted to continue in the upper left corner, why not the middle of the screen. It should be in the middle, in my book.

As far as I can see, the UAC prompt appears directly over the element you clicked. This makes perfect sense if UAC is acting as it’s supposed to and is immediately displaying a permission dialog box. Some video driver bugs in current builds cause some pretty severe delays, which can be annoying to say the least.

Another question from David:

Ok, so I run with an administrator account, I have no created a limited user. I with the UAC had a bit more flexibility in it’s configuration regarding the prompts I receive. For example. I use an explorer replacement. I’ve checked the box under the shortcut that I want the program to run in admin mode. Why am I still prompted to “allow” it to run. I knew what I did when I checked the box, don’t prompt me.

This behavior is the same as in Wiindows XP. Selecting that checkbox says that you want to be prompted to enter a different set of credentials when you run the program. It sounds like what you’re asking for is the ability to declare certain programs or features as being exempt from UAC; that won’t happen. sorry to say.

Kishore asks:

I read earlier (probably, not from this site) that Vista is going to include symbolic links. Is this feature implemented? Is it exposed in explorer or cmd.exe?

Symbolic links, aka symlinks are also known as aliases (to Mac users) or junction points (in the Windows NT family). They’re similar to shortcuts but much more powerful in that a symbolic link looks and acts as if it were part of the file system instead of being a pointer. You make and manage symlinks with the MKlink command. We’ll have several pages on this in Windows Vista Inside Out.

One more from David:

I’m wondering if you can comment on something I just read. In this document [IT Showcase: Explorer 7 Protected Mode] it says that Protected mode is only available for Windows Vista Enterprise and Windows Vista Ultimate. Everything else I’ve read says Protected mode is available in Vista, implying it would be part Windows Vista Basic.

I just checked with Microsoft and they say that’s a mistake. Protected Mode is part of every Vista version, no differences from one to the other.

From Desert Weary:

Just installed Vista Build 5384 and am wondering why SELECT.EXE process is constantly running at 85 – 94% of CPU in task manager. What’s going on? Is this normal?

No, that’s not normal. That process is not a part of Vista, so it sounds like you’ve got a third-party application that isn’t playing nice.

That’s all the time for questions today. Keep ’em coming and I’ll answer some more next week.

Here’s what happens when your tinfoil hat’s too tight

Interesting theory, I suppose.

I wish to ponder whether Microsoft might have directly or indirectly encouraged three prominent bloggers to publicly and passionately implore the company to delay the release of its long-awaited Vista release of Windows.

No, I don’t have evidence that Robert McLaws, Robert Scoble, and Ed Bott were involved in a conspiracy to give Microsoft cover for a significant delay of the next major release of its franchise operating system.

Still, the context of this three-part remonstration is awfully convenient for the executives back in Redmond.

Thank goodness Jim Garrison isn’t around anymore.

Robert’s right: Windows Vista needs more time

Robert McLaws says Microsoft needs to delay Windows Vista. I agree with about 90% of what he says:

I’ve been defending Microsoft’s ship schedule for Windows Vista for quite some time. Up to this point, I’ve been confident that Vista would be at the quality level it needs to be by RC1 to make the launch fantastic. Having tested several builds between Beta 2 and today, I hate to say that I no longer feel that way.

Robert says Microsoft should “Push the launch back 4-6 weeks and launch at the end of February [and] add another beta to the development cycle.” Make that “end of March” and I’ll sign up too.

There’s some truly great stuff in Windows Vista, but current builds are not at the quality level they need to be at for a release candidate to appear in the next few weeks. If management insists on hitting an arbitrary January ship date, the results will be disappointing at best, and potentially nightmarish.

Jim, are you listening?

Waiting for the other shoe to drop

No one outside of the 98052 ZIP code seems to believe that Windows Vista is really going to ship when Microsoft says it will. The latest skeptical word is from Wall Street:

Where on the horizon is Vista?

Officially, Microsoft said last week that it is sticking to its most recently announced schedule of shipping Vista to business customers at the end of this year and launching it for consumers and on new PCs in January.

Few, though, are taking Microsoft at its word.

“Our estimates have already assumed a delay in the Vista launch to March or April,” Goldman Sachs analyst Rick Sherlund said in a research note Friday. [emphasis added]

Another slip in the schedule won’t be disastrous, but it will be embarrassing. My best guess – and that’s all it is, a guess – is that the next time Microsoft makes an official announcement about Vista’s schedule it will contain an actual release date. Better to suffer in silence for another few weeks (or more) than to make another vague pronouncement.

Dueling newshounds

The business press got mixed messages from Microsoft today.

From the Wall Street Journal (subscription only):

Microsoft Confirms Vista Schedule

Microsoft Corp. said it sees no impediment to shipping Windows Vista on time.

Kevin Johnson, co-president of the division that includes Windows, said Thursday the company has test versions of the operating system in the hands of millions of users. So far, nothing has turned up to keep the product from shipping to business customers in November and to consumers in January as planned, Mr. Johnson said at a meeting for analysts.

Bloomberg.com:

U.S. Stocks Slide on Earnings, Possible Microsoft Vista Delay

Technology stocks slid after Microsoft Co-President Kevin Johnson said the world’s largest software company will ship Vista, postponed in March, when it’s ready.

Who do you want to believe?

The Vista time machine

Frank Schrader tells Andrew Tobias:

I installed the beta of Windows Vista [Microsoft’s new operating system] and one of the first things I tried was Managing Your Money DOS Version 12. It works just fine, which is great because I’m not ready to give it up yet. It still does everything I want it to and I have records dating back to 1987!

I used to use MYM DOS back in the late 1980s and early 1990s. It’s startling to think that a program that’s nearly 20 years old actually runs under Windows Vista.

AVG now works with Windows Vista

I know that AVG Free Edition from Grisoft is very popular. But if you tried to install it or one of the commercial AVG anti-virus products on Windows Vista Beta 2 it didn’t install properly. Apparently that’s now been fixed. A download available via Windows Update fixes the installation issue, according to Grisoft. I can confirm that Critical Update 920296 was automatically installed here a couple of days ago. If you’re able to run AVG on Windows Vista, post a comment below.

Microsoft’s KB article 921583 describes the update and includes links for manual downloads of the update. And no, I have no idea why the article and the update have different numbers.

And a reminder that Trend Micro and CA both have free Windows Vista-compatible evaluation versions of their security software available.

Update: In the comments, Mike Dimmick notes that the AVG update is actually numbered 921590. He’s right, as a more careful reading of the article confirms. Update 920296 fixes a separate installation issue that affects unspecified applications.. Thanks, Mike.

Windows Vista Tip #5: Assign a keyboard shortcut to a program

Gerard has a Windows Vista question:

I can’t create Shortcut Keys for Start menu Shortcuts, UAC denies me permission to do so. I specifically tried to assign ctrl-alt-R to Remote Desktop Connection, is it just me? I disable UAC and it works.

This will happen if you try to assign a shortcut to any item on the Start menu that you didn’t personally create, because it exists in the All Users folder, where you’re not the owner of the shortcut. Two solutions:

Option 1: Open Windows Explorer using an administrator account (click Start, All Programs, Accessories; right-click on Windows Explorer and choose Run as Administrator). Now browse to %ProgramData%\Microsoft\Windows\Start Menu\Programs\Accessories and locate the shortcut for Remote Desktop Connection. Right-click and choose Properties. Click in the Shortcut Key box and press the keyboard sequence you want to use. Now you can save the shortcut.

Option 2: Create a new shortcut on the desktop and assign the shortcut key to it. Because you own this shortcut, you can edit it without any UAC prompts.

Setting expectations for Vista and Office ship dates

Bill Gates just gave a speech in South Africa. According to the AP report:

Microsoft Corp. Chairman Bill Gates said Tuesday there was an 80 percent chance the company’s next-generation operating system, Vista, would be ready in January.

[…]

“We got to get this absolutely right,” Gates said. “If the feedback from the beta tests shows it is not ready for prime time, I’d be glad to delay it.”

[…]

Gates said he hoped the next version of Office would be ready in December.

Hope, as they say, is not a development plan.

Without seeing the exact transcript of BillG’s words, I can’t really say what he meant. But the formulation “would be ready” implies “released to manufacturing (RTM).” If so, then the January date for Windows Vista represents a delay of about two months based on the last announcement from Microsoft. That sounds about right to me.

The one thing I think you can say with confidence based on this report is that you won’t be able to buy Office 2007 or Windows Vista this year.

(via Microsoft News Tracker)