Now it’s Apple’s turn in the penalty box

From today’s Wall Street Journal (subscribers only):

Apple Computer is issuing its own big recall of laptop computer batteries, on the heels of a recall by rival Dell that cast a harsh light on the perils of a widely used battery technology. The Consumer Product Safety Commission said Apple plans to recall 1.1 million batteries in the U.S., plus 700,000 batteries sold in other countries. The batteries, like those in the Dell recall, were made by a a unit [of] Sony.

Who’s next?

Update: I see by my server logs that someone at Dell.com is regularly checking the Technorati feed for the keywords “Apple batteries.” Schadenfreude, anyone?

And Dwight Silverman picks up on the “who’s next?” question with word that “Apple, Sony, Dell, HP and Lenovo are planning a battery-manufacturing summit. All of them use Sony-manufactured batteries in their notebooks.”

No more exploding batteries for Dell

The New York Times reports that Dell “is recalling 4.1 million notebook computer batteries because they could erupt in flames.” The story points out what you were probably already thinking as well in a discussion of batteries that have caused fires on airplanes.

Dell’s official notice isn’t up yet, but when it does you’ll be able to read it here, presumably.

If each replacement battery costs about $100, when you figure in the cost of shipping both ways, that’s $400 million. Damn, that’s gotta hurt.

Update: Dell’s Battery Recall site is now live. I got a certificate error when I visited the site using either Firefox 1.5.0.6 or IE7 Beta 3 under Windows, because the secure certificate was issued by Starfield Secure Certification Authority, which is not listed as a trusted certificate provider.

Apple Genuine Advantage?

I just about fell out of my chair when I read this post from Mozilla’s Asa Dotzler:

I’m sitting here with my Leopard preview install DVD and I can’t work up the courage to just blow away Tiger on my only Mac (my primary machine — a MBP.) Heck, I don’t even know if Firefox runs on Leopard.

My first thought was to install Leopard under Parallels on my MBP — just the way I do Vista under VMWare on my Thinkpad. Apparently that’s not possible since Leopard will only install on genuine Mac hardware and Parallels is virtual hardware, even if it’s running on a Mac.

Emphasis added.

How old is too old?

As an experiment, I just resuscitated a Y2K-era notebook with a few inexpensive hardware upgrades, split its hard disk into two 20GB partitions, and installed Windows XP with Service Pack 2 on one and Ubuntu Linux on the other. The results were surprising. (You can read all about it in Linux, XP and my old PC.)

That six-year-old PC turned out to be far from obsolete, which got me thinking about the nature of PC obsolescence.

My first IBM-based computer was built in the early 1980s by a Korean clonemaker and sold under the Leading Edge brand name. It had an Intel 8086 processor running at 8MHz or so and 512K of RAM, if I recall correctly. It had a monochrome monitor, at least one 5.25” floppy drive, and a hard disk whose capacity was measured in some small number of megabytes.

I replaced it with a succession of computers over the next ten years, each with incrementally larger hard disks and slightly faster processors. When I was testing beta versions of Windows 95 (then code-named Chicago) in 1993 and 1994, I was probably using a 33MHz 486 processor with 4MB (or maybe an eye-popping 8MB) of RAM.

Would you expect any of those ancient PCs to be even marginally useful today? Don’t make me laugh. Even the first-generation Pentium 133 and 166 models I spent more than $2000 to purchase in 1996 and 1997 would be nearly useless a mere decade later.

I was able to run the first release of Windows XP (including beta versions from 2000) on PCs built around Intel’s Pentium II series chips from 1998 or so. XP on a 233MHz  wasn’t fast, but it worked. I wouldn’t do that today, however, mostly because the cost of the EDO memory chips it used would be prohibitive. It would probably run $100 to bring it up to its max of 192MB!

Basically, I think any computer using the Pentium 3 family or later and built in 1999 or later should probably be usable with Windows XP today, assuming you can find memory upgrades at a reasonable price.

Just say no to Draft N

Glenn Fleishman says Don’t Buy Draft N:

I am going to make myself extremely unpopular this morning by suggesting that no one buy so-called Draft N Wi-Fi gear that is pouring into the market.

I have to agree. Computer networks are complex enough without adding the complication of a whole generation of equipment that sort of adheres to a standard. If you’re in the market for wireless networking gear, read Glenn’s piece first.

A liquid-cooled video card?

I’m not sure I want something called the TOXIC X1900 XTX to even enter my front door, much less take up permanent residence in my PC. I suppose if I were a hardcore gamer, I’d feel differently about a display adapter that runs at 675 MHz, with 512MB of GDDR3 RAM and presumably needs its liquid-cooling system and pure copper water block to keep it from achieving critical mass.

It looks like something out of Alien.

Toxic_video_card

Something tells me Dwight would like this.

(via Daily Tech)

Signs of cluefulness at Dell

If you’ve read this site for the past year or two, you know I’m not a big fan of Dell. I’ve had too many bad experiences (documented here, here, here, and here, with follow-ups here, here, here, and here).

So I wasn’t surprised last month when I had major problems getting a broken Dell laptop repaired. The motherboard graphics had failed, and the warranty specified that it was eligible for next-day on-site service. I’ll spare you the gory details – let’s just say that it took 19 phone calls and 27 days for a repair person to arrive at my office.

Ho-hum. More of the same, right?

So imagine my surprise when I received a call last week from Dell headquarters. This executive had reviewed my file and was calling to (a) apologize profusely and (b) find out exactly what happened so they could fix the broken process.

We exchanged a few e-mails, and I sent along notes from some of my previous horrifying support experiences. A day or two later I received a note from this executive’s assistant, offering me a fairly substantial no-strings-attached coupon as a “gesture to make amends.”

Now, Dell didn’t track me down because I’ve posted my complaints on this site. In this case, the issue that led to the call was one I hadn’t written about at all, and this executive didn’t seem to know anything about me except that I was an unhappy Dell customer.

This is a first for me, and it’s enough to make me take a fresh look at Dell. I’m still cautious, and it will take years for the company to earn back the trust they’ve lost. But at least they’ve taken a first step.

I’d be very interested to hear from anyone else who has had an unexpectedly good experience with Dell lately.

Yes, Windows Media Center runs on Intel-based Macs

PC World’s Harry McCracken has some questions about Apple’s new Boot Camp software, which lets Intel-based Macs run Windows XP. Like: “Does Boot Camp let you run Windows Media Center?”

Microsoft’s Sean Alexander has some answers:

MCE (and an unreleased player) are running like champs.  I’m hearing reports of Vista running as well.  Battery life still stinks compared to my sony but hey, this is a desktop replacement riight?

Windows Vista running on Apple hardware? The mind boggles:

Venkman: This city is headed for a disaster of biblical proportions.
Mayor: What do you mean, biblical?
Ray: What he means is Old Testament, Mr. Mayor… real Wrath-of-God-type stuff. Fire and brimstone coming down from the skies.
Venkman: Rivers and seas boiling!
Egon: 40 years of darkness, earthquakes, volcanos.
Winston:The dead rising from the grave!
Venkman: Human sacrifice, dogs and cats, living together… mass hysteria!

PC World also has more details on the new $50 virtualization software from Parallels, which claims to allow Intel-based Macs to run Windows XP, several flavors of Linux, and even OS/2 Warp in a virtual machine without dual-booting.

Update: Screen shots and more info about Parallels Workstation 2.1 Beta for Mac OS X. Because it’s currently in beta, it’s free to use.

Want a Vista-ready PC? Skip the sticker

Last week, Microsoft announced that it will change its PC logo program so PC makers can flag computers that are capable of running Windows Vista. Of course, tech websites are falling all over themselves to find a snarky take on the “Vista Capable” program:

PC World’s Harry McCracken: “Next month, new PCs will show up with stickers identifying them as being ‘Windows Vista Capable.’ But ‘Capable of Running Certain Versions of Windows Vista, But Maybe Not Stupendously Well’ might be a more accurate designation, it seems.”

Engadget: “[F]or the general consumer, the Vista Capable badge only means it’ll support the baseline version, Home Basic Edition — which we’ll be promptly ignoring, thankyouverymuch — and may not do fun things like run Aero or be able to use more ‘advanced’ Vista features like HDCP. Normally this is the part where we’d get a little huffy and suggest Microsoft do it this way or that, but we’re starting to feel we’re in a little too deep here, you know?”

RealTechNews: “It’s not going to be available until 2007, but heck, if you can’t get the OS, will stickers do?”

Snark is fun, but the question is real. Should you buy a new PC, or should you wait? And who can make sense of the official Microsoft guidelines?

In a post on my ZDNet blog today, I’ve laid out my three simple rules for buying a new Vista-ready PC. No sticker required. (Hint: For starters, don’t buy a cheap PC.)

Go read it.