Well, this is an interesting idea. According to CNET News, Microsoft is working on some serious changes to its online music service, including this doozy of a feature:
The tentative features of the new service–which is still under development–include advanced community aspects and playlist-sharing. But sources say Microsoft is also considering a more direct attack on Apple, seeking rights from copyright holders to give subscribers a new, Microsoft-formatted version of any song they’ve purchased from the iTunes store so those songs can be played on devices other than an iPod.
OK, now I want the recording industry to really, really think about the implications of this. If I pay a digital music provider to download a track, I’m actually paying two fees. One is a royalty to the artist and the publisher, which is passed through the music service. The other is a fee to the music service for providing the media to me. In this case, Microsoft is apparently arguing that you and I should only have to pay once for the digital rights to a song, regardless of the format it comes in. If iTunes passed along a payment on my behalf, then I have purchased the rights to play that tune, and Microsoft or Rhapsody or Yahoo or whoever should be able to provide that track to me as well. All they have to do is establish that I have already paid for the digital rights to that song.
Here’s where the argument gets sticky. Right now, when I buy a CD, I have the right to rip a copy of it to my hard disk for my personal use. I can make a backup copy of the CD media. I can make a custom mix of tracks, burn it to a CD, and play it in my car. I can copy all those tracks to my personal music player. Using the logic of this rumored Microsoft proposal, I already paid for the digital rights to this song when I bought the CD; my payment was passed to the publisher and artist by the record company from whom I bought the CD. So why can’t I get Microsoft-format digital copies of any music in my CD collection, just by proving to Microsoft that I own the original CD?
Can any of the copyfighters out there tell me what’s wrong with this idea?
(Thanks to Digital Media Thoughts for the pointer)