Remember that big whoop-de-do over Xbox requiring an “always on” connection?

Never mind.

Microsoft: Next Xbox will work even when your Internet doesn’t

According to an internal Microsoft e-mail sent to all full-time employees working on the next Xbox, “Durango [the codename for the next Xbox] is designed to deliver the future of entertainment while engineered to be tolerant of today’s Internet.” It continues, “There are a number of scenarios that our users expect to work without an Internet connection, and those should ‘just work’ regardless of their current connection status. Those include, but are not limited to: playing a Blu-ray disc, watching live TV, and yes playing a single player game.”

Playing a Blu-ray disc? Watching live TV without an Internet connection? Very interesting.

Know your antenna rights

Windows Vista and Windows 7 both have excellent support for over-the-air HDTV signals. If you’re in a city with a clear line of sight to the local broadcaster, you might be able to get by with an indoor antenna. But if you’re in a marginal location, you’ll get better results with an outdoor antenna, on your rooftop if it’s a single family home, or on a balcony or patio if you live in a condominium where the rooftop is a common area and not under your exclusive control.

With the transition to digital broadcasts earlier this year, it’s even more important to have a great digital input source. So what do you do if your homeowners association says “no outdoor antennas”? You point them to the official Federal Communications Commission Fact Sheet on Placement of Antennas. It’s a summary of the Over-the-Air Reception Devices Rule, created by direction of Congress in the Telecommunications Act of 1996.

Continue reading “Know your antenna rights”

More brickbats for Apple TV

Peter Svensson of the AP doesn’t like it:

Apple Inc. has graced the public with another smooth, white, exquisitely designed gadget, this time aiming at making it easier to play iTunes movies and songs on the living-room TV set.

Too bad, then, that where looks really matter – in the quality of the video on the TV screen – the $299 Apple TV comes up short. It’s as if Apple had launched an iPod that sounded like a cassette player

Ouch.

Update: Apparently, Google Finance decided this post deserved to be highlighted on the page where Apple stockholders go to get information about AAPL. So I’m seeing a lot of visitors who don’t know me and don’t quite understand why I bring up an Apple product on a Windows-centric blog.

First of all, as I mention in the comments below, Apple TV is a Windows peripheral. If you have the Windows version of iTunes installed on your PC and you hook up an Apple TV box to your TV, you’ll be able to play music, pictures, and videos from your PC’s library on the TV.

I think this concept of an extender is a good idea. In fact, I have two Windows Media Center extenders in my home and use them regularly. I believe Microsoft has a better collection of technologies than Apple at this point with the Xbox 360 (which blows the doors off Apple TV in terms of picture quality)and with so-called v2 extenders that will connect to Windows Vista Media Center PCs and should be out at the end of this year.

I am a digital media gadget fanatic, but I have no desire to get an Apple TV box. Having seen its specs and read other reviews that emphasize its terrible picture quality, I can’t imagine why Apple released it now instead of waiting until it was actually ready. I’m sure Steve Jobs has some grand plan, though, because everyone knows he never makes a mistake.

Tags:

Tenacious D’s Playlist

OK, this alone justified the $9.95 I paid MTV this month for its URGE service. I have to say, it’s addictive and has worked spectacularly well for more than two months. After my disastrous experience with Napster To Go a few years ago, I was gunshy. But it’s been rock-solid.

The commentary from Jack Black and Kyle Gass is priceless. Sample :

I hate to sound like an old man and keep naming songs from the ’70s and ’80s. … The Cars don’t really make what I’d call sexy music, but the guitar solo in this is so hot [scats guitar sound].

As for the playlist itself, I haven’t summoned up the courage to actually play it yet.

(PARENTAL LYRICS ADVISORY: If you don’t know Tenacious D, this is a good starting point. Imagine that Spinal Tap had grown up in an American suburb in a parallel universe where Jack Black is a rock and roll god. And if bad words offend you, then forget I even mentioned it.)

The return of the random 10

Good heavens – have I really not done this in eight months?

While I’m working on the digital media section of Windows Vista Inside Out, I get to poke around in my music library. I clicked a few buttons today and wound up with this eclectic list for reasons that are unfathomable to me. But it sounds pretty good:

  1. Yakety Axe, Chet Atkins, Neck and Neck
  2. Beautiful and Strange, Shannon McNally, Geronimo 
  3. Popstar, The Pretenders, Viva El Amor
  4. The Shoop Shoop Song (It’s in His Kiss), Cher, The Very Best of Cher
  5. Twilight, Garth Hudson, The Best of Mountain Stage Live, Vol. 1
  6. Loose Fit, Happy Mondays, Pills ‘n’ Thrills and Bellyaches
  7. Tombstone Blues, Bob Dylan, Highway 61 Revisited
  8. Two for the Road, Bruce Springsteen, Tracks Disk 3
  9. I Believe in You, Luther Allison, Blue Streak
  10. Sunday Morning/Sunday Evening, Joe Zawinul, World Tour

And a bonus track:

Get Down Moses, Joe Strummer & The Mescaleros, Streetcore

What digital media system do you use?

I’m researching a story about digital media and am interested in any stories you want to share about how you use digital media in the living room.

Do you have a TiVo? A Media Center, with or without extender or Xbox 360? A cable or satellite company DVR? Have you connected an iPod or other music player to your home stereo? Do you use a third-party program like Sage TV or BeyondTV?

If you don’t currently have any of this hardware, why not?

Distort this

Thomas Hawk understands the power of the Reality Distortion Field

Now I know what some of the Appleheadish types will say. C’mon it’s Steve Jobs. He’s a marketing genius. If anyone can do it Apple can do it. Apple is so damn cool it makes me want to melt down in a puddle of tears as I weep translucently at how amazingly magical their ultra hip marketing department can name things. How nobody cares about HDTV and how people will accept inferior sound quality over at iTunes, so why not with movies.

As we like to say in the reality-based community, read the whole thing. And chuckle.

… Oh, OK. I can’t resist quoting the punch line: “Yes, idiots overpay for things. Yes, there are a lot of idiots out there and yes Steve Jobs may be able to use the Obi Wan Kenobi trick voice with some, but I predict this thing [the iTV] will flop hard.”

YouTube 2006 = Napster 1999

Dylan Tweney is right: 

Media companies should pay attention to the Napster story when they consider YouTube.

Lots of excellent observations here, and some good advice that, if history is any guide, the big media companies will ignore.

One key difference in this comparison is that Napster didn’t have much of a justification under the doctrine of fair use, whereas using YouTube as a repository for short clips from much longer video works can often be justified, especially when there’s substantial commentary that goes with the clip.

But since the very idea of fair use seems to be near death, maybe I’m just dreaming.

Policies should be in writing

Via Frank Shaw, I read this report from Wil Wheaton about his saga to recover his lost iTunes music library. The short version: Computer crashes. WW installs iTunes 7. Plugs in iPod. iTunes library vanishes. WW posts rant on blog. Apple calls and makes good: 

A very kind woman named Kate called me, and told me that she’d read my blog about my problems with my purchased music. … She said that Apple wants to keep their customers happy, and ensure that they’ll be confident purchasing things from the iTunes Music Store, so she was going to push a Big Red Button that would allow me to have a do over, and download all of my purchased music again, free of charge. This seemed excessive to me, and way above what would be reasonably expected, but before I could tell her that, she told me that she’d read on my blog that I didn’t expect Apple to treat me any differently than they’d treat any other customer. She assured me that this is Apple’s corporate policy, and they’ll do this for anyone who has a catastrophic loss of their iTunes Music Store purchases, regardless of the cause.

Yes, this sounds like good customer service. Except that, as I’ve written before, that’s not what their stated policy says:

When you buy a song or album from the iTunes Store, you are entitled to download it only once.

When you buy a song, video, game, or album from the iTunes Store, you are entitled to download it a single time. If you want to download it again, you must purchase it again. You can copy downloaded content between authorized computers.

That page is linked from this article, entitled Finding missing music and video downloads:

You may need to restore the files from your backup, if you have one. If a backup is not available, the music or videos may be lost. In that event you may need to purchase replacements. For content acquired through the iTunes Store, please read Apple’s policy on replacement.

Which takes you back to the earlier page.

How is an average person (someone who wasn’t a Star Trek character and doesn’t have a widely read blog) supposed to know that there is a double-secret corporate policy that contradicts the official written policy?

If a one-time exception is available (but not guaranteed), that should be clearly stated on Apple’s website.

Update 15-Sep: Edited first paragraph to correct error in description of original post by WW.