Specifically, Kate Bevan of The Guardian:
Firefox is wonderful. It’s up there with chocolate and sex on the grand scale of great things about being alive.
Firefox is a really nice browser, but there is no piece of software that deserves to be in the same category as chocolate or sex. There’s no hardware that belongs in that category, either. At least, nothing silicon-based.
Now, siliconE, that’s another story.
Or latex.
Then what is using Opera? Like having sex with Angelina Jolie and Jessica Simpson at the same time?
I heard that the quality of british food, especially chocolate, was poor. But I didn’t know about their seemingly miserable sex life…
Stefan
P.S.: What would the author write about that new porn broser (http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/11/porn-browser-heatseek-launches-yeah-porn-browser/)?
Unless you are using Firefox to order the chocolate, to promote the sex.
I must really be out of the loop because I never equated a browser with sex… but I do prefer Firefox… and I thought I didn’t have a life.
You guys need to understand the style of the Guardian. I don’t think I can come up with a US equivalent, but what I will say is, rather like Saturday Night Live’s “Blacks with No Soul”, the Guardian is home to “Women with No Libido”.
Which, when you consider their head office is only a mile from http://www.libidex.com , is a little sad…